Manuel P. Asensio Chairman of the St. Johns Republican Presidential Executive Committee
Constitutional integrity. Judicial discipline. Asensio for Florida’s 6th.
LAWYERS AND LAWYER-MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ARE CONFLICTED. THEY KNOW ASENSIO. THEY HAVE USED ASENSIO'S IDEAS FOR THEIR OWN SELF-AGGRANDIZEMENT. THEY HAVE BETRAYED THE CONSTITUTION, THE NATION, AND YOU.
Elect Manuel P. Asensio to the
120th United States Congress!
The GOP’S MAGA Movement and the Nation need ASENSIO to take a seat in the 120th US Congress as the Representative for Florida's 6th Congressional District.
2026 Primary Election Day: Tuesday, August 18, 2026.
Polls are open 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Early voting period is August 8–15, 2026.
EDUCATED AMERICAN CITIZENS KNOW THE TRUTH. THEY CONTROL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. THEY ARE THE RESTRAIN AND DISCIPLINE POWER OVER THE LEFTIST FEDERAL JUDGES. AS THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE FLORIDA'S 6TH IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE, I WILL HOLD CONGRESS ACCOUNTABLE AND RESPONSIBLE.
Asensio is will do it for you. He has the POWER, standing, and public-record basis to correct what government lawyers have failed to correct, what Congress failed to regulate, and what the federal judiciary has been allowed to perpetuate: propaganda campaigns from the bench, false historical constitutional narratives, and judicial misconduct masquerading as constitutional interpretation.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S PRIMARY ELECTION IN THE 6TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN FLORIDA
IS THE MOST IMPORTANT GOP CONTEST IN THE NATION
Manuel P. Asensio is the only Republican Party candidate with a plan and the power to vacate and reverse
EIGHT TREASONOUS ACTS EXECUTED BY
LEFTIST FEDERAL JUDGES
1.
STOLEN your power, your authority, your rights that government cannot regulate no matter what process it provides, including your speech, religious, political, and parental liberty,
2.
DISGRACED your Founding Generation, your Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, your Constitution, as racist, and turned truth and justice into
LEFTIST political non-sense and legal absurdities
3.
RAIDED your president’s home based on the lie that he stole his own national security papers
4.
FABRICATED the idea that your president stole $500 million from a bank and ordered your president to pay a $500 million fine
5.
MADE-UP a new law to revived an expired sexual-assault claim against your president, failed to prove it to a jury, and still imposed a $90 million against your president
6.
CONVERTED Hillary's Russian Collusion Story paid for by her and the Democratic Party to obtain the warrants that started the Mueller Investigation
7.
TOOKOVER your president’s vice president, Mike Pence, to lawlessly dismissed all constitutional contraversies in the stolen 2020 presidential election
8.
ABOLISHED the judicial conduct law Congress created in 1980 to allow actions to vacate their 1973 Roe v Wade abortion rule, 42 years later in 2022 they finally vacated their abortion rule after the harm was done
None of this is not constitutional or legal — it's the invention of TREASONOUS Leftist Federal Judges.
Asensio promises you that when he is elected he will win against the Leftist Federal Judges and restore the Constitution as the shield of every American citizen
BOTTOM LINE: ASENSIO PROMISES THAT HE HAS THE POWER, THE RECORD, AND THE STANDING TO MAKE GOOD ON HIS PROMISE.
I, Manuel P. Asensio, Candidate for Congress in the 6th District of Florida, give you my oath that this STATEMENT is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Chief Justice John Roberts is out of control. He claims the federal judges control the Constitution and all laws that govern them. He invented this Great Lie so the federal judges can get away with rulings like
Roe v. Wade or dismissing without review all questions about the 2020 election.
Roberts' real power comes from being the "presiding officer" of the US Judicial Conference not from being one of the nine judges who sit on the US Supreme Court.
Roberts has subverted the Freedom of Information Act,Judicial Conduct Act to consolidate control over not only the US Judicial Conference but the Administrative Office of the US Courts, the Federal Judiciary Center, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. He has an iron fisted control over this vast federal executive bureaucracy to enforce his far left radical idealogy about judicial power and authority over the Constitution, Bill of Rights and any right - natural or legal. Like in Roe v. Wade, Roberts is a lifetime believer that judges have the power to use force to impose their raw will on the nation and its people.
WHY ELECTING ASENSIO MATTERS NOW
Chief Justice John Roberts cannot be corrected by slogans, lawyer excuses, or failed political theater.
He can only be confronted through the Constitution, the public record, the disinfecting effect of sunlight that a representative with the courage and standing to demand consideration, reporting, and discipline.
Manuel P. Asensio is already in that position.
His December 31, 2025 action concerning McFadden and Trump’s lawsuit against Roberts that McFadden dismissed has been incorporated, not merged, into Asensio’s June 25, 2021 demand for consideration and reporting.
That means Asensio is not speaking as a spectator. He is acting from an existing public-record position, built over years, directed at the federal judiciary’s own misconduct machinery.
Electing Asensio to Congress from Florida’s 6th District gives the people a representative who will not protect Roberts, excuse Congress, or hide behind fake legal complexity.
Asensio will demand answers, unite opposition, create media attention, expose the Judicial Conference bureaucracy, force congressional responsibility, and restore the constitutional rule that judges do not control the American people — the Constitution does.
That is why this race matters. A vote for Asensio is a vote to put constitutional discipline, judicial accountability, and election integrity directly into the House of Representatives.
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE TEN HISTORICAL AND LEGAL FACTS THAT WE REPUBLICANS NEED TO KNOW TO
END FEDERAL JUDICIAL TYRANNY.
1
Giovanni Gentile
The Father of Fascism and most notably known for his "Doctrine on Fascism," 1932
Karl Marx
The father of Communism and the author of the "Communist Manifesto," 1848
US federal judges openly dishonor and reject America's glorious history and openly advocate national policies that violate the American Constitution's rules of law, principles, and values. They do so under the protection of lawyers and under the cover of the malicious lie that "postmodern political philosophy" is legally enforceable in US courts.
In fact, postmodern policies are not a high-minded idea to improve America’s constitutional capitalist democratic republic or the secular wisdom of its underlying Judeo-Christian values.
Postmodern policies are the same evil that is Fascism, which was created by Giovanni Gentile (1875 - 1944), and Communism, which created by Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) under a different label. Postmodern policies are the same exact tyranny that the American Constitution out laws under all circumstances and conditions.
In US courts, postmodern policies are evil money-making schemes to destroy the rule of law, limitations on government power, separation of powers, separation of church and state, and due process.
2
Members of the Judicial Conference outside the White House. Chief Justice William Howard Taft is in the first row, second from right. (1926)
On Dec. 28, 1922, Chief Justice William Howard Taft convened a meeting in the Capitol building, in the rooms then reserved for the Supreme Court. The present Supreme Court building had not yet been built. Joining him were the most senior judges from each of the nine existing circuit courts. It was known as the Conference of Senior Circuit Judges.
Today (as the next 8 sections will show) the US Judicial Conference has became the bureaucratic behemoth and the epicenter of organized federal judicial corruption. Unbeknownst to Americans, Chief Justice John Roberts controls the Judicial Conference as its executive officer with an iron fist. More concerning, and also unperceived to Americans, Roberts is the chief justice for life, and because as a matter of law the executive officer of the Judicial Conference is the chief justice, Roberts is also the ruler of the Judicial Conference for life.
He has blatantly and shamelessly declared that Judicial Conference serves as a national policy making body for the federal courts. Chief Justice Roberts along with others in the federal government are openly fabricating national judicial policies to govern rulings in trial and appeal courts in the United States. Cases that challenges any of these judicially fabricated policies are summarily dismissed and cases that advance the Conference's policies are favored.
Americans are repulsed by secret associations, secret proceedings, and secret agreements in any form at any level in our government. Here you have Roberts and Judicial Conference openly and shamelessly engaged in national politics.
In 1934 FDR signed the Rules Enabling Act
By 1934 the Judicial Conference's encroachment on Congress's exclusive power to make laws had become a major problem in American government. The Act was a peace treaty between Congress and the federal judges. In theory, Congress retained the power to review and reject any rule the federal judges created. Of course, Congress has no chance of uniting to reject any rule the federal judges fabricated under the Enabling Act. The federal judges simply created a committee to make deals with the few members of Congress that are suppose to protect you against organized federal judicial corruption.
Today, the left's judicial ideologies has created the notion that the federal judges can create national laws by themselves.
The Nazi government in Germany had passed its own Enabling Act in 1933. It allow them to issue laws without the consent of Germany’s parliament. This is the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society.
The law was celebrated the day after it was published under the name of the “Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich.”
HOW CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS BECOME AMERICA'S "MAD MAN"
The Dirty Half A Dozen
Congressional Failures
Since 1934, Congress and the federal judges have been playing a cat and mouse game. Congress has modified, changes, and amended the Rules Enabling Act of 1934 countless times by Congress. The significant the deals cut by Congress with the federal judges were done in 1950, 1966, 1972, 1988, 1990, and 1992.
1. 1950 Amendment: Supposedly attempted to clarify the rulemaking procedures and extended the act to include rules of criminal procedure.
2. 1966 Amendment: Then Congress widen the scope of the act to allow for the creation of bankruptcy rules.
3. 1972 Amendment: First allowed the federal judges to make up their own evidence rules but then Congress was forced to pass the Federal Rules of Evidence.
4. 1988 Amendment: Rubber stamped the judges appellate procedures deals.
5. 1990 Amendment: Congress gave the judges that power to coordinate rules by themselves.
6. 1992 Amendment: Congress tried again to rein in the federal judges rulemaking processes and ensured compliance with congressional statutes.
THEN CAME GREATEST SINGLE ERROR IN
AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
THE JUDIICAL CONDUCT ACT OF 1980
On October 15, 1980, forty six years and more than a half dozen failed attempts to fix the Rules Enabling Act, President Jimmy Carter (for his own selfish interest of fencing off Ronald Regan's Silent Majority Movement) signed the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act. This law is actually the most significant amendment to the Rules Enabling Act. The Act established a formal process to prosecute corrupt federal judges. The Act explicitly provided all American the power to protect themselves against Congress' original errors in the Rules Enabling Act of 1934.
Roberts has single handedly turned this Act on its head and used to fabricate his own policies. In 2020, Asensio published "Trump Unites All Americans" a graphic novel telling this story to President Donald J. Trump through the eyes of his daughter, Eva. You can click on the button below to read it.
3
THEN CAME ROBERTS!
ROBERTS'S CORRUPTION IN THREE EASY PIECES
How Roberts used the Judicial Conduct Act of 1980 to Put Organized Federal Judicial Corruption on Steroids
1
BY 1980, Americans WERE SO OUTRAGE AND MORALLY DISGUSTED with federal judicial corruption that the Roe vs. Wade decision blew up into Ronald Reagan's Silent Majority movement. In an attempt to take some of the Silent Majority votes, the Democrats passed the Judicial Conduct Act of October 15, 1980, days before the election. He lost anyway.
2
ROBERTS has turned the Judicial Conduct Act, the most powerful law ever enacted since the passing of the Bill of Rights that was created by amending the Constitution, upside down. The Act completely reorganized the Judicial Conference to deal with the organized federal judges' corruption. However, Congress made a fatal mistake. IT GRANTED THE CHIEF JUSTICE ABSOLUTE POWER TO KEEP THE WHOLE THING SECRET! EVEN WORSE, CONGRESS HAD PREVIOUSLY MADE THE MISTAKE OF GRANTING THE CHIEF JUSTICE ABSOLUTE POWER OVER THE RULE ENABLING ACT!
3
There is nothing complicated or mysterious about Roberts or his conduct. Roberts has simply organized and controls federal judicial corruption - he put Roe vs. Wade on steroids. Its judges doing dirty deals and then using their government positions as judges to deliberately violate the Constitution's limitations and separations of powers and due process - its malicious judges faking being good judges. Good judges do not lie and cheat and use the US marshal's in their courtrooms to silence their opposition to dismiss cases and favor cases to concentrate power for themselves.
4
Ted Cruz
Lindsey Graham
Jim Jordan
Our GOP leaders who set the Republican Party's federal judiciary policies are responsible for reviewing and regulating Chief Justice Roberts policy making and conduct.
Roberts could not have transformed the US Judicial Conference into a policymaking juggernaut without making agreements with the members of Congress who control the nation's federal judicial policy. Together this group has become a shadow government operating a national policymaking bureaucracy entirely outside of law, not in accordance with the Constitution but in accordance with post-modern political philosophy.
5
Roberts and his wife, Jane Roberts, who has allegedly been paid more than $10 million by an array of D.C. law firms for work as a "legal recruiter."
On top of everything else, Roberts is the Chancellor of Smithsonian Institution’s Board of Regents that includes three members of the Senate; three members of the House of Representatives; and nine citizen members who are nominated by the Board approved by the Congress in a joint resolution with the President of the United States.
6
Independence Hall where In 1776 our Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence.
In 1788, the Founding Fathers and later delegates to the Constitutional Convention created and signed the United States Constitution. It was here where the Founding Fathers shared and debated the federalist papers.
The Founders' Federalist Papers are the foundation of the US Constitution and cornerstone of US law.
7
In crafting the Constitution the Founding Fathers sought to ensure that “the general liberty of the people can never be endangered by the federal judiciary,” that “liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary” and recognized that liberty has “everything to fear” from federal judicial corruption.
8
America’s lead writer of the Federalist Paper, Alexander Hamilton shared the Founding Father’s fear of corrupt federal judges, we wrote that “of the three powers, the judiciary is next to nothing.”
9
The Founders described the federal judges as “beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power” who must never be able to attain the power to “attack with success either of the two other branches [the president or Congress].”
For all these good natural reasons, the Founders prohibited federal judges having any political power to keep them for having any “ influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society and can take no active resolution whatever.”
10
YOU ARE RIGHT!
IT'S OBVIOUS. NOW YOU HAVE THE POWER TO FIX IT!
Records at the US Judicial Conference contain inexorable evidence showing Robert deliberately repeatedly violating the Judicial Conduct Act’s Black Letter Laws that command him to enter orders forbidding any federal judge or group of federal judges who is the subject to proceedings under the Judicial Conduct Act from appearing at the Judicial Conference and Judicial Councils.
These Laws apply to the chief judges of the nation's 13 US circuit courts and 93 US district courts. Yet never in the 44 years since the Judicial Conduct Act was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter has one US attorney or any federal judge ever used law to prosecute a federal judge.